Chartered Accountants (CAs) play a crucial role in audits, tax filings, and certifications. With increasing scrutiny under Income-tax and GST laws in India, questions often arise about when a CA can be held liable during tax investigations. This comprehensive guide explains CA liability, legal protections, and the latest Supreme Court viewpoint in clear, practical language.
Understanding CA Liability in Tax Investigations
CA liability refers to the professional and legal responsibility arising during Income Tax or GST enquiries. A CA’s work, involving audits, certifications, statements, and filings, is governed by:
- Income-tax Act, 1961
- CGST Act, 2017
- ICAI Code of Ethics
Key Principle
A CA becomes liable only when they knowingly certify false information, falsify documents, or actively assist in tax evasion. Routine queries or reliance on client records do not attract criminal liability.
Core Principles of CA Liability
1. Not Automatically an Accused
A CA summoned for clarification or documents is not treated as an accused unless evidence indicates involvement.
2. Intent or Gross Negligence Required
Liability arises only when misconduct is wilful or grossly negligent as per ICAI standards and statutory provisions.
3. Role-Based Responsibility
A CA is accountable only for work falling within the scope of the assignment signed.
4. Client Holds Primary Responsibility
Books of accounts, invoices, and the correctness of tax positions belong to the taxpayer—not the CA—unless red flags were ignored.
Legal Framework Governing CA Liability in India
Income-tax Act, 1961
CAs issue multiple statutory reports and certificates such as:
- Section 44AB – Tax Audit Report
- Section 92E – Transfer Pricing Report
- Form 15CB – Certificate for foreign remittance
Key Penalty Provisions:
- Section 271J: ₹10,000 penalty for incorrect reports/certificates knowingly furnished.
- Section 273B: Penalty waived if “reasonable cause” is proven.
CGST Act, 2017
Relevant sections affecting professionals:
- Section 122(1): Penalties on the taxpayer for specified offences.
- Section 122(1A): Higher penalties on persons retaining benefit from fake ITC or similar offences.
- Section 122(3): Up to ₹25,000 penalty for aiding or abetting GST offences.
- Section 132: Criminal prosecution (up to 5 years) for wilful abetment of major tax offences.
Important: A CA is liable only when they knowingly assist in evasion. Preparation or filing of returns alone does not create criminal liability.
ICAI Disciplinary Mechanism
Under the CA Act, 1949, ICAI investigates professional misconduct through:
- Director (Discipline)
- Board of Discipline
- Disciplinary Committee
Possible actions: Reprimand, monetary penalty, or removal from the register.
When Can a CA Be Held Liable?
A CA may be liable in situations involving:
- Wilful Misstatement – knowingly certifying false information.
- Gross Negligence – ignoring obvious discrepancies.
- Active Collusion – participating in fake billing or ITC schemes.
- Fabrication of Records – creating or backdating documents.
When a CA Cannot Be Treated as an Accused
A CA cannot be held liable when:
- No evidence shows involvement in the offence.
- Certification is based on client-provided records without red flags.
- Summons are issued only for clarification or documentation.
- Intent (mens rea) is absent.
Judicial View (Latest)
The Supreme Court in K. Murali Krishna Chakrala v. Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement (November 2025) held that:
- Professionals acting in good faith
- Without evidence of knowledge or collusion
- Performing statutory duties
cannot be prosecuted under tax laws or PMLA.
The Court clarified that issuing Form 15CB in routine practice does not amount to abetment unless the CA was aware of illegality.
Practical Examples
1. GST Case – Fake Invoices by Client
If the CA files GST returns based on documents provided by the client → Not liable, unless the CA knew the supplier was fake.
2. Tax Audit Observations
If the CA reports issues in Form 3CD but the client still makes questionable claims → Client is liable unless the CA hid information.
3. Issuing Form 15CB Without Verification
If a CA certifies foreign remittances without checking supporting records → Potential liability for gross negligence.
Best Practices: Compliance & Documentation
- Maintain detailed working papers and email trails.
- Sign engagement letters specifying scope and limitations.
- Exercise professional scepticism:
- Verify GSTIN validity
- Check bank statements
- Flag unusual patterns
- Follow ICAI auditing standards (SA 230, SA 500).
- Preserve soft copies, ERP logs, and computational files.
CA Responsibilities During Investigations
- Provide documents when legally required.
- Maintain client confidentiality.
- Never sign backdated or unsupported certificates.
- Seek legal counsel in sensitive cases.
Relevant Sections at a Glance
- Income-tax Act: Sections 44AB, 92E, 271J, 273B
- GST Law: Section 122, Section 132
- ICAI Code of Ethics: Engagement acceptance, documentation standards
Recent Developments
The 2025 Supreme Court ruling strongly protects CAs who issue Form 15CB in good faith. The Court held that routine certification does not amount to abetment under PMLA or tax laws unless knowledge of illegality is proven.
Conclusion
CA liability in tax investigations is limited, evidence-based, and role-specific. A CA becomes liable only when intent, collusion, or gross negligence is established. Strong documentation and adherence to professional standards are the best defence.
Action Points for CAs
- Maintain comprehensive working papers.
- Avoid signing any certificate without adequate support.
- Encourage full client compliance with tax laws.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. Can a CA be accused in a GST investigation?
Only when evidence shows intent, collusion, or active involvement.
2. What protects a CA from liability?
Proper documentation, engagement letters, and following the ICAI Code of Ethics.
3. Is a CA responsible for client-provided documents?
No—unless knowingly certifying false information.
4. Can tax officers summon a CA?
Yes, but this does not automatically make the CA an accused.
5. What is Section 271J?
A penalty of ₹10,000 for knowingly issuing an incorrect report/certificate.
6. Does the Supreme Court’s 2025 Form 15CB judgment apply to PMLA?
Yes. Issuing Form 15CB in good faith does not amount to abetment under PMLA.
Disclaimer: This guide provides general informational insight into CA liability during tax investigations in India. It is not professional legal or tax advice. Consult a qualified expert for case-specific guidance.
Related Posts:
Why Chartered Accountants Cannot Be Treated as Accused in GST Investigations